Sukm After 21 years, US releases Saudi engineer from Guantanamo military prison

Deoband: Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind President, Maulana Arshad Madani, expressed anger over the recent incident in Sambhal and approached the Supreme Court, stating that incidents like Sambhal are happening due to the lack of proper implementation of laws for the protection of places of worship. He said that despite the Places of Worship Act, 1991, lower courts are ordering surveys of Muslim worship sites, which is a violation of this law. The Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind has filed a petition in the Supreme Court for the protection and effective enforcement of the law regarding the security of religious places, on which there has been no hearing for the past year. It has appealed to the apex court, urging it to hear the case as soo stanley cup n as possible. Also ReadSambhal violence: Life returns to normal as schools reopen after clashes Maulana Madani stated: Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind stands with the victims of police firing and brutality in Sambhal. He strongly condemned the police firing and highlighted the long history of police brutality , whether it was in Maliana, Hashimpura, Mor vaso stanley adabad, Haldwani, or Sambhal. The verdict in the Babri Masjid case was humiliating. This judgment used the argument that no mosque was built in Ayodhya, which Mu stanley cup slims have had to swallow bitterly. However, this decision was thought to bring peace and order to the country. But after the verdict, communal forces gained confidence. Now, even after this decision, attempts are being made to search for te Lzms Cricket:聽Top stars will be badly missed in Champions Trophy tournament

Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has observed that the Reserve Bank of India has been a mute s stanley quencher pec stanley termos tator while banks are imposing arbitrarily high interest rates on customers despite guidelines issued by stanley germany the banking regulator. The observation was made by a bench comprising Justices Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Prashant Kumar while disposing of a petition filed by Manmeet Singh who had availed of a loan of Rs 9 lakh from a private bank. Surprisingly, RBI had been issuing guidelines but has done nothing for the implementation of the same. They have just been a mute spectator allowing the banks to charge arbitrarily a very high rate of interest, the court observed. On the RBI responsibility as the banking regulator in the country, the court said, Even if the benefit of doubt is given to the banks that they are free to charge the interest rate but it is duty of the RBI to see that the customers are not inconvenienced by huge rate of interest charged by the banks. Also ReadFacility to exchange/deposit Rs 2,000 notes to remain closed on Jan 22: RBI The petitioner had obtained Rs 9 lakh loan from the Standard Chartered Bank with a variable interest rate of 12.5 per cent per annum. After repaying off the entire amount, the petitioner requested a no dues certificate ; and property document from the bank, which were promptly provided. When Singh checked his loan account, he was shocked to find that the bank had debited